Employers Are Not Off the Hook When Employees Go Hands Free
by Veronica M. Gray and Brad Grabske

Employers seeking to increase productivity by arming their employees with cell phones and PDAs (personal digital assistant) not only have a new statute to comply with -- the California Wireless Telephone Automobile Safety Act of 2006 -- which becomes effective on July 1, 2008, but also face: (1) increased risks of liability from third-party personal injury claims; (2) possible claims for unpaid compensable time; and (3) additional work related injuries.

 

1.  The California Wireless Telephone Automobile Safety Act of 2006

 

According to a 2005 study commissioned by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (“IIHS Study”), drivers who use cell phones, even hands-free models, are 400 times more likely to be involved in serious accidents.  Not surprisingly, California passed legislation prohibiting drivers’ use of hand-held cell phones.  The California Wireless Telephone Automobile Safety Act of 2006, codified as Vehicle Code Section 23123, takes effect in July 2008 and will make it an infraction to drive a motor vehicle while using a cell phone, unless the phone is configured to allow hands-free listening/talking and is used in that manner.  Violators will pay a fine of $20 for the first offense and $50 for subsequent offenses.  Exceptions to Section 23123 include, among others, emergency calls and push-to-talk hand-held phones that drivers of certain commercial vehicles may continue to use until July 2011.  Interestingly, the IIHS Study found that cell phones with hands-free operation offered little or no appreciable safety advantage over hand-held operation – suggesting that laws allowing drivers to use hands-free devices will not materially curb the accident risks associated with cell phone use. 


[FULL STORY]
 

Also of Interest
On June 3-4, Nossaman Partner George Joseph gave a presentation titled “Bearing the Bad News:  Handling Layoffs and Reductions in Force” at the 2008 PIHRA Mid-Year Legal Seminars in Garden Grove and Glendale.  To view a copy of his presentation, please click here.


Nossaman Partner John Kennedy recently gave the presentation “Mandatory Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Regulations and Expanded Leave Benefits for Military Families" to the Association of Corporate Counsel, Sacramento Chapter.  To view a copy of his presentation, please click here.

> FORWARD UPDATE

> SUBSCRIBE/UNSUBSCRIBE

June 25, 2008



 
EMPLOYMENT PRACTICE
Veronica M. Gray
949 477-7663
Brad Grabske
949 477-7614
Carl L. Blumenstein
415 438-7219
John T. Hansen
415 438-7245
Paul A. Hemesath
916 442-8888
Michael Heumann
213 612-7830
E. George Joseph
949 477-7636
John T. Kennedy
916 442-8888
Bradford B. Kuhn
949 477-7651
Jeremy A. Lutsky
213 612-7861
Jessica R. Madrigal
415 438-7212
Julie E. McComb
916 930-7711
Robert S. McWhorter
916 930-7745
Lloyd W. Pellman
213 612-7802
Jan Vaughn Mock
415 438-7284
Radhika Sood
949 477-7617
Stephen P. Wiman
213 612-7818
Scott N. Yamaguchi
213 612-7807
nossaman.com

LOS ANGELES    SAN FRANCISCO    ORANGE COUNTY    SACRAMENTO 
WASHINGTON, D.C./VIRGINIA    AUSTIN    SEATTLE

This message is being sent to you in compliance with proposed Federal legislation for commercial e-mail (S.1618 - Section 301). Pursuant to Section 301, Paragraph (a)(2)(C) of S. 1618, further transmissions to you by the sender of this e-mail may be stopped at no cost to you by submitting a request to REMOVE in the subject line to info@nossaman.com or by clicking 'unsubscribe' above. The information contained herein does not constitute a legal opinion and should not be relied upon by the reader as legal advice or be regarded as a substitute for legal advice. The opinions expressed in this article are personal opinions of the authors and do not necessarily reflect opinions held by other members of their firm or by clients of the firm. Copyright © 2008 Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP. All rights reserved. "Nossaman Employment LawSM" is a service mark of Nossaman Guthner Knox & Elliott LLP.