Thursday, March 11, 2010
Archived Issues
2004-4 Overtime, Mergers, T&E
October 8, 2004
2004-3 Household Employee, Fraud, Website, Keep People
May 31, 2004
2004-2 HIPAA, Stark, Cafe Plans; K Labor
May 16, 2004
2004-1 Antitrust, Billing & IRS errors, HSAs
March 13, 2004
2003-8 Health Savings, IRS, Appeals, Pymnt Posting
December 8, 2003
2003-7 manuals, mgma comp, ftc, hipaa
October 12, 2003
2003-6 Marketing, Revenues, Negotiation
July 9, 2003
Human Resource, Mgd Care, Advice
July 8, 2003
2003-4 Medicare, MD Comp, Reimb, Front Desk
May 22, 2003
2003-3 Fraud, Stark, Recall
April 26, 2003

[MORE]
In This Issue
Insight on "Incident To" Billing
Healthcare Antitrust Update
2004 Tax Changes
2005 Standard Mileage Rates Set
Insight on "Incident To" Billing
The Texas Medicare carrier, Trailblazer, recently issued guidance on how to bill "incident to" services.
[FULL STORY]
 


2004 Tax Changes
Some recent tax law changes are effective for the 2004 Tax Year. If these items affect you, be sure to get the details when you prepare your tax return early next year.
[FULL STORY]
 


2005 Standard Mileage Rates Set
The Internal Revenue Service has released the optional standard mileage rates to use for 2005 in computing the deductible costs of operating an automobile for business, charitable, medical or moving expense purposes.
[FULL STORY]
 


Healthcare Antitrust Update

From McDermott Will Emory law firm: In an initial decision made public November 16, 2004, Administrative Law Judge D. Michael Chappell found North Texas Specialty Physicians ("NTSP") to be in violation of Section 5 of the FTC Act by illegally engaging in a horizontal price-fixing conspiracy in the market of physician services in the Fort Worth, Texas area. FTC Dkt. No. 9312. Judge Chappell entered an order enjoining NTSP from negotiating non-risk contracts on behalf of its member physicians and requiring NTSP to provide payors with an opportunity to terminate their existing contracts without penalty.

However, NTSP may still enter into qualified risk-sharing or clinically-integrated joint arrangements and messenger objective information about payor offers, including objective comparisons with terms offered by other payors, to its physician members. This case is significant as it is the first fully adjudicated complaint brought by the Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") against an independent practice association ("IPA") accused of price-fixing. It is also noteworthy because the court's remedy was more limited than the relief sought by the FTC, relief that the FTC has aggressively pursued and obtained in recent consent decrees with other IPAs. Neither the FTC or NTSP has indicated whether they intend to appeal the ruling.

 
Published by Reed Tinsley CPA
Copyright © 2004 Reed Tinsley CPA. All rights reserved.
Interested in an
email newsletter?
Click here for details